Facebook is as good as poop in the face
October 11th, 2007 @ 4:12 pm by zymetricAs part of facebooks new developers platform, there is now an application that allows you to throw poop at your friends, and according to the developers, as many as 75,000 people are doing that per day! Gasp! Still no word from facebook officials on our proposal to supply them with additional types of fake poop or virtual vomit, or to sponsor other poopworthy endeavors.
Well, if you don’t feel like spending virtual bucks to throw virtual poop at your virtual friends, note that we have many sizes, types, and textures of real fake poop to accomodate everyone, all at discounted pricing of course. Also note that we will gladly send blind shipments to anyone w/o a packing list or other personally identifiable information. And your friends will actually feel these hitting them!
We couldn’t find a video of this new app and are far to lazy to shoot one, (anyone?), so we leave you with a video we shot last March. Hit play & enjoy
[via business2.0 ]
December 12th, 2007 04:55
So self righteous about protecting your own copyrighted images/text, yet you blatantly rip one of Lou Reed’s songs for use on your commercial website. Nice.
December 12th, 2007 11:55
Yes, because dubbing a song over a video is exactly the same as stealing over 25 pictures & descriptions (verbatim!), and then passing those off as your own to your
2510 monthly customers. And yet, they are still live on your site, as this is being typed. You should at least remove those before you troll.December 12th, 2007 13:18
Yes it is actually. Thanks for agreeing.
December 14th, 2007 14:39
Over 25 of our copyrighted images are still on your server, right this second, yet oddly you found the time to modify one picture (and by modify I mean d/l one without a watermark from another site & replace, not actually picking up a camera and shooting one yourself). Up until yesterday that picture in question STILL had our company name clearly & visibly watermarked in it, even after all this time – something screenshots & timestamped source code confirm. That said, your actions clearly indicate that you have no intention of removing the rest of our other intellectual property as they don’t have said watermarks, which is honestly, whatever. You did remove the text, which is all we truly cared about in the first place. Really. So thank you for that, and our apologies if you misinterpreted the tone and/or sarcasm in any of our posts, or even here.
Regarding the validity of your other statement, a more apples / apples comparison would be us trying to pass off the Velvet Underground (Lou Reed) song as our own, as you were doing with our property on monkeypoo, and not simply using that song as background as millions of other people do on youtube & the like. Or like we did in our crappy beverlyhills “cover” and year and a half ago.
Enough said.